Recently in Westlaw Category

This post was written by Greg Lambert: "I feel like I've been picking on the folks at Thomson Reuters regarding the launch of WestlawNext, especially with this post last week.  I expected a quick response from Thomson Reuters on my questioning their approach to pushing this out to law firms and more specifically to law students.  The response came this morning from Anne Ellis, Senior Director of the Westlaw Library Relations team.  I thought I'd push this out on the blog as a more reasoned response than the one we got from the anonymous 'A Westlaw Rep.'  In fact, I hope that Anne cc'd all 'Westlaw Reps.' on this so that they can give a better response to the specific questions we had on the roll-out. The first three paragraphs are mostly 'corporate speak', but Anne goes on to answer some of the questions we had on the effect that law students will have on the new search algorithm (which was my primary concern.)..."

 

Continue reading this interesting post and reach the active links by clicking on the author's name.

Source: 3 Geeks & a Blog, 15 February 2010. Reproduced with permission of the authors.

This post was written by Greg Lambert: "As I mentioned yesterday, a group of bloggers traveled to ThomsonReuters (TR) in Eagan, Minnesota earlier this week to get a first-hand look at WestlawNext (WLN) and talk with the Project Cobalt team, meet briefly with TR's CEO of Legal, Peter Warwick, and discuss the functionality of WLN with Westlaw's Reference Attorney staff. There are a number of articles that are out from other bloggers that a range of issues from Lisa Solomon's discussion of Product & Pricing; Jason Eiseman's video interview of myself, Tom Boone and Jason Wilson; Robert Ambrogi's discussion of West Search functionality; Betsy McKenzie's view of WLN from an academic perspective; Ken Adam's survey on CALR value in contract drafting; David Bilinsky's Top 10 list about WLN, and; Simon Chester's discussion of WLR from a Canadian perspective. I wanted to take a different approach and talk about the back-end structure of the new West Search Engine and how they have used Knowledge Management theories to create an algorithm that looks to be much better than the current Westlaw.com search results..."

 

Full text and active links are available by clicking on the author's name.

Source: 3 Geeks and a Blog, 28 January 2010. Reproduced with permission of the author.

This post was written by Simon Chester: "Yesterday, two members of Slaw were given an in-depth look at the most profound re-engineering of a legal research system since the migration to the Web. In Thomson Reuters' impressive Eagan facility we had a briefing on the new Westlaw - to be launched at New York LegalTech next Monday under the name WestlawNext.

 

WestlawNext is the culmination of five years of research and development and a massive amount of customer research into how legal research is actually carried out..."

 

Continue reading this interesting post by clicking on the author's name.

Source: Slaw.ca, 27 January 2010. Reproduced with permission of Simon Fodden, founder of Slaw

This post was written by Greg Lambert: "I found out a bit more information on the next generation of Westlaw. They have dropped the cool "Project Cobalt" name, and have picked "West Next" as the name of the product being released at LegalTech in February...

"Westlaw Classic" Remains...

Different Look and Feel...

Collaborate Through Shared Folder Functions...

Some Firms Testing Now... Full Release at LegalTech...

 

I look forward to seeing the new "West Next" product. Those that have seen it seem to think it is a very good product."

 

The full text of this post is available at the source site listed below

Source: 3 Geeks and a Law Blog, 8 January 2010

From the site: "As we all know by now, Google Scholar is now home to legal documents. Here's the RS overview post from launch day. As we said then, It will be interesting to see how often the database is updated, if those updates are announced, and if Google will provide a directory/catalog/guide of what is available.

In this Above the Law post, Kashmir Hill, provides comments from Westlaw and LexisNexis.

The comments are what you would expect but are still worth a quick read.

Westlaw

We provide the breadth of information and technology tools to help quickly zero in on specific cases and the facts embedded within them. We provide the context, expert analysis from our attorney-editors and links to supporting materials to help users find the right answers, faster. And, Westlaw includes workflow tools so that our customers can use this information as part of their client workstream.

LexisNexis

They [LN Legal Customers] look to LexisNexis to find needles in the ever-growing information haystack, not the haystack itself. Not only do we provide the most complete portfolio of public and proprietary legal content, but LexisNexis enables legal professionals to conduct their research more efficiently, effectively, and with the assurance of accuracy.

Access the Complete Post and Comments

Source: Above the Law

The active links are available at the source site listed below.

Source: ResourceShelf, 25 November 2009

From the site: "West, part of Thomson Reuters, has announced that 30 of their titles will be available for the Amazon.com Kindle.

 

As electronic book readers increase in popularity with students and professionals, West is making nearly 30 of its titles available for electronic download for the Amazon Kindle. The addition of electronic versions of selected titles allows West to meet the needs of law students, law school faculty and legal professionals who are increasingly using new electronic media in the classroom, on the job and for personal use.

 

You can learn more and review the 30 titles via this news release.

[Their] Source: West (via PR Newswire)

 

The active links are available at the source site listed below.

Source: ResourceShelf, 8 October 2009

Posted by Joe Hodnicki: "Susan Nevelow Mart's (Faculty Services Librarian, UC Hastings Law Library) has uploaded Reining in the Results: The Use of Human Indexing and Computer Algorithms in West's Headnotes & Key Numbers and LexisNexis's Headnotes & Topics as Tools for Finding Relevant Case Law to SSRN in draft form. The article was presented at the Conference on Legal Information: Scholarship and Teaching, held at the University of Colorado Law School as part of its Boulder Summer Conference Series. So while it appears to be a work-in-progress, it should be very near final.

Mart took an admittedly small sample, "ten pairs of matching headnotes from legally important federal and California cases and reviewed the cases in the results sets generated by each classification," to compare these two very different systems, West's human indexing and LexisNexis' algorithmic indexing systems. So any results have to be qualified from the start. Not a complaint, the task is simply too much for one person to perform comprehensively.

Among Mart's findings: the average percentage of relevant cases found using West's Key Numbers was 83.2%, LexisNexis's More Like this Headnote was 62.3%, and Lexis Topics was 40.5%. Mart writes:

Since a major difference between the two systems would seem to be the degree of dependence of algorithms for creating classification topics and assigning headnotes to each topic, the role of human editors appears to be a definite advantage in returning relevant results. It seems that it is only the Key Number search results that are limited to those cases where the language of the headnote is present, and if limiting terms are present, where those terms also appear. This is definitely an advantage, but the advantage is not inclusive of all relevant cases.

Why? Because the LexisNexis classification system also returns a substantial percentage of relevant cases not found in West's Key Number System: 44% in LexisNexis More Like This Headnote and 28.2% in Lexis Topics.

See also Mart's findings for her study of using headnotes as limiters in KeyCite and Shepard's. Mart conclusion in a nutshell: don't rely on one vendor's tools for comprehensive cast law research. Mart's advice and article is highly recommended."

The active link is available at the source site listed below.

Source: Law Librarian Blog, 24 September 2009

Posted by Robert J. Ambrogi: "Two major legal publishers announced initiatives this week to help laid-off lawyers keep their heads above water and make the transition to new jobs. Coincidentally or not, both West and LexisNexis announced their initiatives on the same day.

 

 West's initiative is a two-pronged effort built around two new Web sites. The first prong is Between Cases, a new site intended to serve as an online resource for displaced legal associates seeking employment and networking opportunities. The site includes job search tools, legal education offerings from West LegalEdCenter, information and resources for setting up a private practice, and special offers from Westlaw and other West services.

 

Between Cases also offers free resources for displaced attorneys who want to use their transitional time to perform pro bono work. To that end, the second prong of West's initiative is something it calls Do Justice. In cooperation with the Pro Bono Institute, West is contributing over $12 million in free Westlaw access to law firms to support pro bono work they do. Read more about both of West's initiatives at the Thomson Reuters blog Legal Current and in this news release.

 

LexisNexis is calling its initiative Lend a Hand. It is offered to U.S. attorneys who recently worked for a law firm with more than 50 attorneys and who are currently unemployed. The program offers free marketing services, networking opportunities and employment resources. These include:

 

  • A free profile on Lawyers.com and Martindale.com.
  • Free access to Martindale-Hubbell Connected, the company's professional networking site.
  • Free access to the Martindale-Hubbell Career Center, where attorneys can search for legal jobs in their areas.

 

These freebies from Lexis will last for six months. To get them, you need to qualify, as described above, and sign up by the end of August."

 

The active links are available at the source site listed below.

Source: Legal Blog Watch, 1 July 2009

Posted by Carolyn Elefant: "OK, so I understand that a company like Thomson Reuters doesn't "get" the concept of free.  After all, Westlaw, one of Thomson Reuters' flagship legal products costs a pretty penny.  Even so, it's one thing to charge for a product that delivers value, as Westlaw undeniably does.  It's quite another to extract payment for materials that are either readily available for free or worse, are completely inaccurate.  Yet that's what exactly what Findlaw, a Thomson Reuters company is doing to solo and small law firms.

 

Like many other commercial legal product providers, Findlaw is jumping aboard the solo express, scrambling to offer products and services to this previously overlooked segment of the legal population now that solo is the new Soho.  Now, even though I've been serving solo and small firms at My Shingle for six and a half years, I don't take resent the johnny-come-lately's, particularly if they can offer useful content that I can't provide.  And on the surface, Findlaw's recently upgraded Law Firm Business Center seemed to do just that, with some informative (albeit extremely basic) videos on topics like law firm structure or fee agreements as well as a collection of articles (albeit outdated and sparse) on practice management issues

 

I grew excited when I came across a link to Attorney Forms and what appeared to be a searchable data base of forms that lawyers can use in starting a practice.  So I began playing poking around and to my horror, I discovered that (1) Findlaw is charging for the same forms that are available at MyShingle FOR FREE and (2) many of the forms that Findlaw holds out as "official forms" for a jurisdiction are substantially different from the FREE forms which the jurisdiction provides and which are also accessible at no charge through MyShingle.

 

For example, I decided to take a look at adoption forms for California.  While the site allows for a free on-screen preview of the forms, you need to pay $12.95 to download a usable version.  However, you can access those same adoption forms for free directly from the California court site, which in turn is directly accessible from MyShingle's Soloformania.  Moreover, by visiting the court website directly through Soloformania instead of downloading the forms, you're assured of getting the most up to date version.

 

The Findlaw site is even more pathetic when it comes to retainer agreements, engagement letters or other forms for running a practice. As most lawyers know, the provisions required in retainer agreements are often state specific.  Many states have "magic language" that require lawyers to spell out certain matters to clients in contingency cases or other requirements.  For example, compare the sample engagement letter for Missouri that Findlaw is selling for $12.95 with the retainer letter sample that is available FREE from the Missouri bar and accessible through MyShingle.com at our Bars Reviewed (under Missouri, practice resources).  Now granted, the Bars Reviewed links to just 10 or 12 bars that have sample agreements on line, but the agreements are free and far more robust than anything on sale at Findlaw.

 

We're entering a precarious time when charlatans, opportunists and even established organizations that never gave solos a passing glance are angling for a piece of this growing market.  Findlaw isn't the first company to try to prey on solos and small firms with a garbage site masquerading as content and it won't be the last.  Caveat solos." 

From the blog: "As firms everywhere are trying to cut costs, you can do your share by being efficient with your use of Lexis and Westlaw!

From CM Law Library Blog"

 

The active links are available at the source site listed below.

Source: Moritz Legal Information Blog, 7 May 2009

February 2010

Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4 5 6
7 8 9 10 11 12 13
14 15 16 17 18 19 20
21 22 23 24 25 26 27
28            

Categories